Macro-5 Staging TD Candidate Overview — R2-B2 (2026-06-19)
Macro-5 Staging TD Candidate Overview — R2-B2 (2026-06-19)
Date: 2026-06-19 · Workstream: R2-B2-MACRO-5-STAGING-BUILD-AUTHORIZATION-PACKAGE-2026-06-19 (Deliverable 13 of 110) · Editorial revision: rev1
Class: non-executable staging TD candidate (overview) · READ-ONLY · NON-ENACTING · NON-AUTHORIZING · NO write performed.
Metadata convention. Editorial revision (rev1) only. AgentData storage revision/
content_lengthauthoritative at read time.
NON_EXECUTABLE_TD_CANDIDATE. No SQL · No DDL · No migration · No rollback script · No command sequence · No schema file · No table creation. Describes object roles and field families only — never executable implementation.
0. Status and non-authorization
STATUS: PASS — engineering / design-only. The overview of a candidate staging technical design, expressed at the role/field-family level. Engineering PASS ≠ authority PASS. Default: HOLD.
1. Purpose
Answer macro question 3 — what is the non-executable staging build TD candidate? — as an orientation, not a build spec.
2. Sources / evidence read
Macro-4 staging workbench concept/boundary/lifecycle/naming (D6–9); standard IO envelope (D19); B2 IO contracts (D29–36). Main process, no reader-agents.
3. Accepted baseline (carried)
The workbench is a disposable workshop producing candidate inspect_*; how a surface is materialized is FUTURE_TECHNICAL_DESIGN_REQUIRED.
4. Evidence / analysis — candidate TD shape (roles only)
| Candidate area | Role (no implementation) | Deliverable |
|---|---|---|
| object model | the conceptual objects a workbench needs | 14 |
| contract map | how objects map to the IO envelope + B2 contracts | 15 |
| naming model | a disposable, run-id-scoped naming discipline | 16 |
| lifecycle model | provision→seed→exercise→observe→reject→dispose | 17 |
| evidence model | append-only, records-not-decides | 18 |
| error model | fail-closed candidate error/reject | 19 |
| rollback model | one-run delete unit; downstream-certify surfaced | 20 |
5. Candidate / requirement / gate / result
This candidate carries no executable artifact: no CREATE, no INSERT, no function body, no migration, no command. It is a description a future TD could start from after an Owner authority-PASS — not a TD and not actual B2 TD.
6. Owner-gated future work
Turning the candidate into a real TD (with DDL) is Owner-gated and separate; forbidden now.
7. What remains unresolved
Every materialization detail is FUTURE_TECHNICAL_DESIGN_REQUIRED; STAMP/GATE logic remains the least-precedented part.
8. Ready for GPT/Codex review
Yes — Codex should confirm the candidate stays at role/field-family level with zero executable tokens.