Macro-5 Staging TD Candidate No-Executable-DDL Lock — R2-B2 (2026-06-19)

Date: 2026-06-19 · Workstream: R2-B2-MACRO-5-STAGING-BUILD-AUTHORIZATION-PACKAGE-2026-06-19 (Deliverable 21 of 110) · Editorial revision: rev1 Class: no-executable-DDL lock · READ-ONLY · NON-ENACTING · NON-AUTHORIZING · EXECUTABLE_TD_DRIFT guard · NO write performed.

Metadata convention. Editorial revision (rev1) only. AgentData storage revision/content_length authoritative at read time.

---

0. Status and non-authorization

STATUS: PASS — engineering / design-only. Confirms the staging TD candidate contains no executable DDL. Engineering PASS ≠ authority PASS. Default: HOLD.

1. Purpose

Hold the line that a candidate TD must not become an executable TD.

2. Sources / evidence read

Staging TD candidate overview (13) + object model (14); prompt §9.1 (NON_EXECUTABLE_TD_CANDIDATE) and §6 (H1). Main process, no reader-agents.

3. Accepted baseline (carried)

The candidate may describe object roles and field families, not executable implementation.

4. Evidence / analysis — DDL audit

Executable DDL token	Present in 13–20?
CREATE TABLE / CREATE SCHEMA	no
ALTER TABLE / ADD COLUMN	no
CREATE INDEX / CREATE FUNCTION / CREATE TRIGGER	no
a schema/migration file	no
a typed/constrained column declaration	no

5. Candidate / requirement / gate / result — drift trigger (→ HOLD)

Any executable DDL appearing in a candidate = EXECUTABLE_TD_DRIFT → HOLD. Status this run: NOT triggered. The candidate stays at role/field-family level.

6. Owner-gated future work

Writing real DDL is Owner-gated future TD; forbidden now.

7. What remains unresolved

All schema materialization is FUTURE_TECHNICAL_DESIGN_REQUIRED.

8. Ready for GPT/Codex review

Yes — Codex should grep the candidate for DDL tokens and find none.