Macro-5 Staging Build Authorization Summary for Owner — R2-B2 (2026-06-19)
Macro-5 Staging Build Authorization Summary for Owner — R2-B2 (2026-06-19)
Date: 2026-06-19 · Workstream: R2-B2-MACRO-5-STAGING-BUILD-AUTHORIZATION-PACKAGE-2026-06-19 (Deliverable 107 of 110) · Editorial revision: rev1
Class: authorization summary (for Owner) · READ-ONLY · NON-ENACTING · NON-AUTHORIZING · NO write performed.
Metadata convention. Editorial revision (rev1) only. AgentData storage revision/
content_lengthauthoritative at read time.
0. Status and non-authorization
STATUS: PASS — engineering / design-only. The Owner-facing summary of what is being asked and what stays gated. Engineering PASS ≠ authority PASS. Default: HOLD.
1. Purpose
Summarize the staging-build authorization in Owner terms.
2. Sources / evidence read
Staging build authorization ballot (6) + question (7) + authority boundary (8); final go/no-go (50). Main process, no reader-agents.
3. Accepted baseline (carried)
The ask is to build one disposable, isolated workbench — not certify, not canonicalize, not open TD.
4. Evidence / analysis — for the Owner
| Question the Owner faces | Macro-5 answer |
|---|---|
| What would I be authorizing? | building one disposable B2 workbench (candidate-only, deletable, no production touch) |
| Is it being asked now? | no — the ballot is prepared, not cast; default HOLD |
| Why not yet? | SB gate NO-GO; channel/S2/Điều 0-G undecided; all blockers OPEN |
| What is the smallest "yes"? | authorize a build under a named isolation scheme + verification harness; no TD |
| What stays forbidden regardless? | certify/canonical/identity/KG/owner-row/promotion/actual-TD |
5. Candidate / requirement / gate / result
The summary asks nothing of the Owner here; it scopes the eventual ask. The default for every decision is HOLD. A "yes" later authorizes a build only.
6. Owner-gated future work
The build authorization is the Owner's to grant; forbidden to pre-empt.
7. What remains unresolved
No decision made; SB gate NO-GO.
8. Ready for GPT/Codex review
Yes — Codex should confirm the summary scopes a build-only ask and pre-fills nothing.