KB-FA02

Macro-4 No-Production-Touch Master Proof Plan — R2-B2 (2026-06-19)

3 min read Revision 1
laws-newR2-B2macro-4no-production-touchmaster-proof-plannon-authorizing2026-06-19

Macro-4 No-Production-Touch Master Proof Plan — R2-B2 (2026-06-19)

Date: 2026-06-19 · Workstream: R2-B2-MACRO-4-STAGING-WORKBENCH-IO-CONTRACT-TD-ENTRY-GATE-2026-06-19 (Deliverable 43 of 90) · Editorial revision: rev1 Class: no-production-touch master proof plan · READ-ONLY · NON-ENACTING · NON-AUTHORIZING · NO write performed.

Metadata convention. Editorial revision (rev1) only. Storage revision/content_length authoritative at read time.


0. Status and non-authorization

STATUS: PASS — engineering / design-only. The master plan for proving (later) that the workbench never touched production. Engineering PASS ≠ authority PASS. Default: HOLD.

1. Purpose

Answer macro question 5 — what no-production-touch proof is required? — as a single master plan.

2. Sources / evidence read

Workbench no-production-touch requirements (11); pilot-slice staging IO contract §11; bad-input/delete-fast plan §10; Macro-3 no-production-touch risk map. Main process, no reader-agents.

3. Accepted baseline (carried)

The proof is a before/after comparison of production counts/checksums plus the staging evidence (CAV-3/CAV-4: read-only tooling proves state via snapshots/catalog reads).

4. Evidence / analysis — proof plan structure

Part Deliverable Proves
Before/after snapshot 44 production counts/checksums identical
Forbidden surfaces 45 the exact surfaces that must be unchanged
Runtime proof obligations 46 what a runtime check must show
Source proof obligations 47 no source/law/report patched
Promotion firewall 48 no staging→production flow

5. Contract / requirement / matrix / result

This macro itself honored no-production-touch: only read-only query_pg/list_docker + KB doc creation (Deliverable 81 ledger). For a future B2 run, the plan is the required shape of proof; no such proof is run here.

6. Owner-gated future work

Running the proof against a built workbench is Owner-gated; forbidden now.

7. What remains unresolved

The concrete snapshot harness is FUTURE_TECHNICAL_DESIGN_REQUIRED.

8. Ready for GPT/Codex review

Yes — Codex should confirm the plan covers runtime + source + promotion proof.

Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/dev/laws-new/newlaws/consolidation/macro4-no-production-touch-master-proof-plan-2026-06-19.md