Macro-4 Draft Object Replace Contract — R2-B2 (2026-06-19)
Macro-4 Draft Object Replace Contract — R2-B2 (2026-06-19)
Date: 2026-06-19 · Workstream: R2-B2-MACRO-4-STAGING-WORKBENCH-IO-CONTRACT-TD-ENTRY-GATE-2026-06-19 (Deliverable 16 of 90) · Editorial revision: rev1
Class: draft object replace contract · READ-ONLY · NON-ENACTING · NON-AUTHORIZING · CONCEPT-ONLY · NO write performed.
Metadata convention. Editorial revision (rev1) only. Storage revision/
content_lengthauthoritative at read time.
0. Status and non-authorization
STATUS: PASS — engineering / design-only. How a draft object is replaced with no cascade. Engineering PASS ≠ authority PASS. Default: HOLD.
1. Purpose
Define the "replaced separately" property: swap a wrong draft for a better one without breaking any other LEGO part.
2. Sources / evidence read
Inspect-producer §10 (replace by swapping channel, keep the B3 contract); Macro-3 delete-fast risk map; LEGO boundary map (3). Main process, no reader-agents.
3. Accepted baseline (carried)
B2's channel is a replaceable internal (B2-AC-7); the contract (read uncertified → write inspect_*) is invariant across the swap.
4. Evidence / analysis — replace contract
| Property | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Contract-invariant | the IO contract stays fixed; only the internal (channel/decomposition) changes |
| No cascade | replacing one draft breaks no other draft and no production surface |
| Disposal-first | the old draft is delete-fast'd before/independently of the new one |
| Pointer-only links | cross-references are pointers; a replaced draft leaves no dangling write |
5. Contract / requirement / matrix / result
Replacement = (delete old disposable unit) + (born new disposable unit) against the same IO contract. Because the contract is the only coupling, a replacement is local and safe. No replacement is performed here.
6. Owner-gated future work
Replacing a built draft is Owner-gated; forbidden now.
7. What remains unresolved
Replacement mechanics are FUTURE_TECHNICAL_DESIGN_REQUIRED.
8. Ready for GPT/Codex review
Yes — Codex should confirm replacement touches only the internal, never the contract or production.