Macro-3 Điều 0-G Final Recommendation (2026-06-19)
Macro-3 Điều 0-G Source-Authority Final Recommendation (2026-06-19)
Date: 2026-06-19 · Workstream: R2-B2-MACRO-3-OPTION-D-OWNER-DELEGATE-DECISION-PACKAGE-2026-06-19 (Deliverable 24 of 60) · Editorial revision: rev1
Class: Điều 0-G final recommendation · READ-ONLY · NON-ENACTING · NON-AUTHORIZING · RECOMMENDATION_ONLY — NOT AUTHORITY · SOURCE_ADOPTION_DRIFT guard · NO source adopted/recovered/patched · NO write performed.
Metadata convention. Editorial revision (rev1) only. Storage revision/
content_lengthauthoritative at read time.
Source-adoption lock. This recommends a path; it adopts no source, recovers nothing, patches nothing. Per CAV-2: working-source legibility ≠ authority. Any wording that reads as adoption/recovery/patch is
SOURCE_ADOPTION_DRIFT→ HOLD.
0. Status and non-authorization
STATUS: PASS — engineering / decision-prep. Carries Macro-2's Điều 0-G ballot into a final recommendation of a path, adopting nothing. Engineering PASS ≠ authority PASS. Default: HOLD.
1. Purpose
Answer macro question 3 — what Điều 0-G source-authority path should GPT recommend?
2. Sources / evidence read
Macro-2 Điều 0-G source-authority ballot, lineage matrix, working-vs-authoritative packet, adoption-risk memo, non-adoption register, owner decision ballot; inspect-producer TD-prep BI-5. Main process, no reader-agents.
3. Accepted baseline (carried)
Working source = the legible architecture/ document (PEN/STAMP/GATE rules readable); authoritative source = recovered + anchored. Constitution ref law-00g-birth.md is broken; PEN built (Phase A), STAMP/GATE never built. GATE-3 (source authority) = NO_GO. Three options: 0G-A recover-first, 0G-B accept-with-caveat, 0G-C defer.
4. Evidence / analysis
The gap is authority, not content: the rules are legible but unreconciled in the inspected substrate. Per CAV-2 this does not assert unrecoverability — recovery via external S6 (out-of-band) is possible. Accept-with-caveat unblocks TD design now but leaves a HIGH residual on STAMP/GATE (the never-built rules), tolerable only if the producer stays fail-closed on any rule it cannot resolve (BI-5).
5. Recommendation / matrix / result (RECOMMENDATION_ONLY — NOT AUTHORITY)
| Rank | Path | When | Residual |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | 0G-A recover-first | if S6 is reachable without derailing timeline | lowest — restores authority |
| Fallback | 0G-B accept-with-caveat | only for TD-basis, caveat recorded, producer fail-closed | HIGH on STAMP/GATE |
| Holding | 0G-C defer | if neither is acceptable | none, but no progress |
Do not adopt the source now. Do not patch the source now. The Owner chooses the path (D31).
6. Owner-gated future work
Recovering via S6, waiving GATE-3 with caveat, or fixing the broken anchor are all Owner acts; forbidden now.
7. What remains unresolved
GATE-3 NO_GO; source authority unrecovered; STAMP/GATE residual HIGH.
8. Ready for GPT/Codex review
Yes — Codex should attack whether "accept-with-caveat for TD-basis only" can stay non-adopting in practice.