KB-3C96

Macro-3 Điều 0-G Final Recommendation (2026-06-19)

4 min read Revision 1
laws-newR2-B2macro-3dieu0gfinal-recommendationrecommendation-onlynon-authorizingowner-gated2026-06-19

Macro-3 Điều 0-G Source-Authority Final Recommendation (2026-06-19)

Date: 2026-06-19 · Workstream: R2-B2-MACRO-3-OPTION-D-OWNER-DELEGATE-DECISION-PACKAGE-2026-06-19 (Deliverable 24 of 60) · Editorial revision: rev1 Class: Điều 0-G final recommendation · READ-ONLY · NON-ENACTING · NON-AUTHORIZING · RECOMMENDATION_ONLY — NOT AUTHORITY · SOURCE_ADOPTION_DRIFT guard · NO source adopted/recovered/patched · NO write performed.

Metadata convention. Editorial revision (rev1) only. Storage revision/content_length authoritative at read time.

Source-adoption lock. This recommends a path; it adopts no source, recovers nothing, patches nothing. Per CAV-2: working-source legibility ≠ authority. Any wording that reads as adoption/recovery/patch is SOURCE_ADOPTION_DRIFT → HOLD.


0. Status and non-authorization

STATUS: PASS — engineering / decision-prep. Carries Macro-2's Điều 0-G ballot into a final recommendation of a path, adopting nothing. Engineering PASS ≠ authority PASS. Default: HOLD.

1. Purpose

Answer macro question 3 — what Điều 0-G source-authority path should GPT recommend?

2. Sources / evidence read

Macro-2 Điều 0-G source-authority ballot, lineage matrix, working-vs-authoritative packet, adoption-risk memo, non-adoption register, owner decision ballot; inspect-producer TD-prep BI-5. Main process, no reader-agents.

3. Accepted baseline (carried)

Working source = the legible architecture/ document (PEN/STAMP/GATE rules readable); authoritative source = recovered + anchored. Constitution ref law-00g-birth.md is broken; PEN built (Phase A), STAMP/GATE never built. GATE-3 (source authority) = NO_GO. Three options: 0G-A recover-first, 0G-B accept-with-caveat, 0G-C defer.

4. Evidence / analysis

The gap is authority, not content: the rules are legible but unreconciled in the inspected substrate. Per CAV-2 this does not assert unrecoverability — recovery via external S6 (out-of-band) is possible. Accept-with-caveat unblocks TD design now but leaves a HIGH residual on STAMP/GATE (the never-built rules), tolerable only if the producer stays fail-closed on any rule it cannot resolve (BI-5).

5. Recommendation / matrix / result (RECOMMENDATION_ONLY — NOT AUTHORITY)

Rank Path When Residual
Primary 0G-A recover-first if S6 is reachable without derailing timeline lowest — restores authority
Fallback 0G-B accept-with-caveat only for TD-basis, caveat recorded, producer fail-closed HIGH on STAMP/GATE
Holding 0G-C defer if neither is acceptable none, but no progress

Do not adopt the source now. Do not patch the source now. The Owner chooses the path (D31).

6. Owner-gated future work

Recovering via S6, waiving GATE-3 with caveat, or fixing the broken anchor are all Owner acts; forbidden now.

7. What remains unresolved

GATE-3 NO_GO; source authority unrecovered; STAMP/GATE residual HIGH.

8. Ready for GPT/Codex review

Yes — Codex should attack whether "accept-with-caveat for TD-basis only" can stay non-adopting in practice.

Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/dev/laws-new/newlaws/consolidation/macro3-dieu0g-final-recommendation-2026-06-19.md