Macro-3 Điều 0-G Defer Final Case (2026-06-19)

Date: 2026-06-19 · Workstream: R2-B2-MACRO-3-OPTION-D-OWNER-DELEGATE-DECISION-PACKAGE-2026-06-19 (Deliverable 27 of 60) · Editorial revision: rev1 Class: Điều 0-G case (0G-C) · READ-ONLY · NON-ENACTING · NON-AUTHORIZING · SOURCE_ADOPTION_DRIFT guard · NO write performed.

Metadata convention. Editorial revision (rev1) only. Storage revision/content_length authoritative at read time.

---

0. Status and non-authorization

STATUS: PASS — engineering / decision-prep. The case for defer. Engineering PASS ≠ authority PASS. Default: HOLD.

1. Purpose

Give the Owner the honest case for doing neither recovery nor waiver yet.

2. Sources / evidence read

Macro-2 owner decision ballot (0G-C), non-adoption register. Main process, no reader-agents.

3. Accepted baseline (carried)

0G-C = keep GATE-3 NO_GO; do not open Đ0-G-dependent TD; a safe holding pattern with no progress on the source.

4. Evidence / analysis

For 0G-C: (a) zero risk of premature adoption or a bad waiver; (b) appropriate if S6 is unreachable and the Owner is unwilling to carry the HIGH 0G-B residual. Against: it makes no progress; the Đ0-G-dependent slice of B2 TD stays blocked indefinitely. It is the correct default but a poor destination.

5. Recommendation / matrix / result

Recommend 0G-C as the safe default if neither 0G-A nor 0G-B is acceptable — equivalently, the standing HOLD. Not a progress path.

6. Owner-gated future work

Leaving 0G-C later requires choosing 0G-A or 0G-B; Owner-gated.

7. What remains unresolved

Source authority unrecovered; Đ0-G-dependent TD blocked.

8. Ready for GPT/Codex review

Yes — Codex should weigh defer's "no progress" against the accruing backlog cost.