Macro-2 Điều 0-G Source-Authority Ballot — R2-B2 (2026-06-19)
Macro-2 Điều 0-G Source-Authority Ballot — R2-B2
Date: 2026-06-19 · Workstream: R2-B2-MACRO-2-OWNER-DECISION-PREREQ-CLOSURE-READINESS-2026-06-19 (Deliverable 19 of 45) · Editorial revision: rev1
Class: Điều 0-G source-authority ballot / decision-prep · READ-ONLY · NON-ENACTING · NON-AUTHORIZING · NO source recovered · NO source adopted · NO law/note/report patched · NO write performed.
Metadata convention. Editorial revision (rev1) only. AgentData storage revision/
content_lengthauthoritative at read time; not pinned here.
Source-authority lock. This ballot asks the Owner the Điều 0-G source questions. It recovers no source, adopts no rule-set, patches no law/note/report.
SOURCE_ADOPTION_DRIFT→ HOLD. Per CAV-2: asserts only that Điều 0-G is unreconciled in the inspected substrate, not unrecoverable.
0. Status and non-authorization
STATUS: PASS — engineering / decision-prep. The Điều 0-G source-authority ballot: accept-with-caveat vs recover-first, the STAMP/GATE least-precedented risk, and the evidence required. It adopts nothing.
Engineering PASS ≠ authority PASS. Default disposition: HOLD. No source recovered/adopted; no patch; no DB write/DDL/DML; no TD; no blocker resolved; v0.1 not overwritten; v0.2 not authority.
Evidence basis — FRESH read of the Điều 0-G source (architecture/birth-registry-law.md) + INHERITED_KB_EVIDENCE (Điều 4 note: broken Constitution ref). Reading discipline: main process, no reader-agents.
1. Purpose
Answer macro question 5 (Đ0-G) — should the working Điều 0-G source be accepted as TD basis with caveat, or recovered first? — as a ballot, without deciding.
2. Sources / evidence read
architecture/birth-registry-law.md (Điều 0-G v1.0, read first-hand: §2.4 PEN/STAMP/GATE, §VI DOT table Phase-A/Phase-B); the 30-file Đ0-G source-authority recheck; the Mega-Gate Đ0-G source-authority gap (SG-1…SG-6); the Điều 4 note (broken law-00g-birth.md ref). Read directly, main process.
3. Accepted baseline (carried)
G-3 = NO_GO_SOURCE_AUTHORITY. Điều 0-G lives at architecture/birth-registry-law.md (a working architecture doc, not in laws/, not in the Constitution); the Constitution's law-00g-birth.md reference is broken; STAMP/GATE are Phase-B and never built. Recovery is out-of-band (external S6); the alternative is Owner acceptance of the working source with the caveat recorded (a GATE-3 waiver).
4. Evidence / analysis (FRESH re-read of source)
- The rule-set is legible (§2.4): PEN = code/origin/species present; STAMP = name/description/status present; GATE = species-fit ("đúng chuồng") + business rules; fail → audit queue; auto-certify when all three present; strict PEN→STAMP→GATE order; one column per inspector.
- The anchor is broken (Điều 4 note): the Constitution's
law-00g-birth.mdreference does not resolve; the source isarchitecture/-only. - STAMP/GATE are least-precedented (§VI):
dot-inspect-pen= Phase A (built, PEN only);dot-inspect-stamp/-gate/dot-certify-scan= Phase B (Planned, never built). - Read-only cannot recover the source (it is a source-authority gap, not a content gap).
5. Điều 0-G source ballot (the ballot must NOT adopt source)
| # | Question (to Owner) | Options | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0G-Q1 | Accept the working Điều 0-G source as TD basis with caveat (GATE-3 waiver)? | accept-with-caveat / no | HOLD — not adopted |
| 0G-Q2 | Or recover the source first (external S6, out-of-band)? | recover-first / no | HOLD — not recovered |
| 0G-Q3 | Acknowledge the STAMP/GATE least-precedented risk (never built; most source-dependent)? | acknowledged / needs-more-evidence | HOLD |
| 0G-Q4 | What evidence is required before adoption? | authoritative anchor (Constitution ref fixed) + pinned PEN/STAMP/GATE definitions + S6 sign-off | HOLD |
Result: four questions posed; none answered; no source recovered or adopted; no patch made. OWNER_DECISION_REQUIRED.
6. Owner-gated future work
| Future work | Gate | Forbidden now? |
|---|---|---|
| Recover Điều 0-G to an authoritative source | external S6 — Owner OOB | Yes |
| Accept the working source with caveat (GATE-3 waiver) | Owner decision, caveat recorded | Yes (not done here) |
Patch the broken Constitution law-00g-birth.md reference |
separate Owner-gated documentary step | Yes |
7. What remains unresolved
- G-3 open; source neither recovered nor adopted.
- STAMP/GATE least-precedented.
- Blockers — all OPEN.
8. Ready for GPT/Codex review
Yes — as the Điều 0-G source ballot.
Core rule: the ballot asks accept-with-caveat vs recover-first + the least-precedented risk + the evidence required; it adopts no source, recovers nothing, patches nothing.
Default disposition: HOLD. Engineering PASS ≠ authority PASS. All blockers remain OPEN.