KB-5875

Macro-2 Điều 0-G Source-Authority Ballot — R2-B2 (2026-06-19)

5 min read Revision 1
laws-newR2-B2macro-2dieu0gsource-authority-ballotnon-authorizingowner-gated2026-06-19

Macro-2 Điều 0-G Source-Authority Ballot — R2-B2

Date: 2026-06-19 · Workstream: R2-B2-MACRO-2-OWNER-DECISION-PREREQ-CLOSURE-READINESS-2026-06-19 (Deliverable 19 of 45) · Editorial revision: rev1 Class: Điều 0-G source-authority ballot / decision-prep · READ-ONLY · NON-ENACTING · NON-AUTHORIZING · NO source recovered · NO source adopted · NO law/note/report patched · NO write performed.

Metadata convention. Editorial revision (rev1) only. AgentData storage revision/content_length authoritative at read time; not pinned here.

Source-authority lock. This ballot asks the Owner the Điều 0-G source questions. It recovers no source, adopts no rule-set, patches no law/note/report. SOURCE_ADOPTION_DRIFT → HOLD. Per CAV-2: asserts only that Điều 0-G is unreconciled in the inspected substrate, not unrecoverable.


0. Status and non-authorization

STATUS: PASS — engineering / decision-prep. The Điều 0-G source-authority ballot: accept-with-caveat vs recover-first, the STAMP/GATE least-precedented risk, and the evidence required. It adopts nothing.

Engineering PASS ≠ authority PASS. Default disposition: HOLD. No source recovered/adopted; no patch; no DB write/DDL/DML; no TD; no blocker resolved; v0.1 not overwritten; v0.2 not authority.

Evidence basis — FRESH read of the Điều 0-G source (architecture/birth-registry-law.md) + INHERITED_KB_EVIDENCE (Điều 4 note: broken Constitution ref). Reading discipline: main process, no reader-agents.


1. Purpose

Answer macro question 5 (Đ0-G) — should the working Điều 0-G source be accepted as TD basis with caveat, or recovered first? — as a ballot, without deciding.


2. Sources / evidence read

architecture/birth-registry-law.md (Điều 0-G v1.0, read first-hand: §2.4 PEN/STAMP/GATE, §VI DOT table Phase-A/Phase-B); the 30-file Đ0-G source-authority recheck; the Mega-Gate Đ0-G source-authority gap (SG-1…SG-6); the Điều 4 note (broken law-00g-birth.md ref). Read directly, main process.


3. Accepted baseline (carried)

G-3 = NO_GO_SOURCE_AUTHORITY. Điều 0-G lives at architecture/birth-registry-law.md (a working architecture doc, not in laws/, not in the Constitution); the Constitution's law-00g-birth.md reference is broken; STAMP/GATE are Phase-B and never built. Recovery is out-of-band (external S6); the alternative is Owner acceptance of the working source with the caveat recorded (a GATE-3 waiver).


4. Evidence / analysis (FRESH re-read of source)

  • The rule-set is legible (§2.4): PEN = code/origin/species present; STAMP = name/description/status present; GATE = species-fit ("đúng chuồng") + business rules; fail → audit queue; auto-certify when all three present; strict PEN→STAMP→GATE order; one column per inspector.
  • The anchor is broken (Điều 4 note): the Constitution's law-00g-birth.md reference does not resolve; the source is architecture/-only.
  • STAMP/GATE are least-precedented (§VI): dot-inspect-pen = Phase A (built, PEN only); dot-inspect-stamp/-gate/dot-certify-scan = Phase B (Planned, never built).
  • Read-only cannot recover the source (it is a source-authority gap, not a content gap).

5. Điều 0-G source ballot (the ballot must NOT adopt source)

# Question (to Owner) Options Default
0G-Q1 Accept the working Điều 0-G source as TD basis with caveat (GATE-3 waiver)? accept-with-caveat / no HOLD — not adopted
0G-Q2 Or recover the source first (external S6, out-of-band)? recover-first / no HOLD — not recovered
0G-Q3 Acknowledge the STAMP/GATE least-precedented risk (never built; most source-dependent)? acknowledged / needs-more-evidence HOLD
0G-Q4 What evidence is required before adoption? authoritative anchor (Constitution ref fixed) + pinned PEN/STAMP/GATE definitions + S6 sign-off HOLD

Result: four questions posed; none answered; no source recovered or adopted; no patch made. OWNER_DECISION_REQUIRED.


6. Owner-gated future work

Future work Gate Forbidden now?
Recover Điều 0-G to an authoritative source external S6 — Owner OOB Yes
Accept the working source with caveat (GATE-3 waiver) Owner decision, caveat recorded Yes (not done here)
Patch the broken Constitution law-00g-birth.md reference separate Owner-gated documentary step Yes

7. What remains unresolved

  • G-3 open; source neither recovered nor adopted.
  • STAMP/GATE least-precedented.
  • Blockers — all OPEN.

8. Ready for GPT/Codex review

Yes — as the Điều 0-G source ballot.

Core rule: the ballot asks accept-with-caveat vs recover-first + the least-precedented risk + the evidence required; it adopts no source, recovers nothing, patches nothing.

Default disposition: HOLD. Engineering PASS ≠ authority PASS. All blockers remain OPEN.

Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/dev/laws-new/newlaws/consolidation/macro2-dieu0g-source-authority-ballot-2026-06-19.md