Incomex AI Portal
KB-1CD4

Codex Review - Phase-1B Runtime Truth & Blocker Decision Packet

10 min read Revision 1
reportscodexhistorical-sync

Codex Review - Phase-1B Runtime Truth & Blocker Decision Packet

Date: 2026-06-17 Agent: Codex Mode: independent adversarial control review Scope: read-only review of Phase-1B packet and execution report

Verdict

STATUS: PASS_WITH_MINOR_METADATA_TYPO

Phase-1B is a valid decision bridge. It converts the accepted Phase-1 runtime truth baseline into an Owner-facing blocker matrix, documentary-lag separation, corrected findings register, R1-R5 macro packages, execution order, TD gate, and OD-1..OD-8 decision prompts.

No Phase-1B blocker is falsely marked resolved. No remediation package is write-authorized. No Claude patch is required before Owner chooses the first package.

The only defect found is non-material: the execution report lists the decision packet content_length as ~25,800, while Agent Data metadata reports 32902. The packet body is present, rev1, untruncated, and internally complete; this is a metadata typo, not a material review failure.

3 Cau Tuyen Ngon

  1. Vinh vien: This review does not fix an incident or change runtime; it validates whether the decision bridge preserves the Phase-1 runtime truth and keeps future fixes Owner-gated.
  2. Nhamm duoc khong: The packet uses explicit non-authorization, per-row blocker status, forbidden actions per package, and OD prompts to prevent accidental remediation/TD/implementation.
  3. 100% tu dong: N/A for implementation; this mission is a control review only. For future work, automation remains gated by R1-R5 and the existing DOT/Owner approval discipline.

Files / Versions Read

  • .claude/skills/incomex-rules.md - 36 items / 8-step Incomex workflow.
  • knowledge/dev/ssot/operating-rules.md - OR v7.58, 2026-05-01, via search_knowledge("operating rules SSOT").
  • knowledge/dev/laws/constitution.md - Constitution v4.6.3, via search_knowledge("hien phap v4.0 constitution"); current hit is v4.6.3, not v3.9.
  • knowledge/dev/laws/dieu39-knowledge-graph-law.md - Dieu 39 Knowledge Graph v2.3 BAN HANH.
  • knowledge/dev/laws/dieu35-dot-governance-law.md - Dieu 35 DOT Governance v5.2 FINAL BAN HANH.
  • knowledge/dev/laws/dieu32-approval-law.md - Dieu 32 Approval v1.1 BAN HANH.
  • knowledge/dev/architecture/birth-registry-law.md - Dieu 0-G Birth Registry v1.0.
  • knowledge/dev/laws-new/newlaws/consolidation/phase1b-runtime-truth-blocker-decision-packet-2026-06-17.md - rev1, content_length 32902.
  • knowledge/dev/laws-new/newlaws/reports/phase1b-runtime-truth-blocker-decision-execution-report-2026-06-17.md - rev1, content_length 11178.
  • knowledge/dev/laws-new/newlaws/reports/phase1-readonly-runtime-blocker-verification-2026-06-17.md - rev1, content_length 37588.

Evidence Output

Agent Data metadata:

decision packet: revision=1, truncated=false, content_length=32902
execution report: revision=1, truncated=false, content_length=11178
Phase-1 report: revision=1, truncated=false, content_length=37588

Local path check:

wc/sed on workspace-relative Phase-1B paths: No such file or directory
Agent Data search_knowledge exact packet path: found decision packet, execution report, and Phase-1 report

Git/workspace status before report write showed unrelated existing changes and untracked files; no source/KB files were patched by this review.

Primary Questions

  1. Is Phase-1B a valid decision bridge? PASS. Packet section 0 states Phase-1 runtime truth -> Owner decision -> remediation macro workstreams -> later TD. Sections 4-9 implement that bridge.

  2. Did it avoid remediation / technical design / implementation? PASS. It forbids live query, DDL/DML, runtime patch, source patch, current corpus, draft adoption, full TD, schema/table/index creation, materialization, DOT/KG/promote/birth/repair execution, migrations, and write-tests. R1-R5 are future Owner-gated packages only.

  3. Did it correctly apply the two Phase-1 caveats? PASS. PH1-F1 is corrected to Dieu 39 / KG provenance, HIGH. PH1-F3 is split HIGH for birth-dependent TD and MEDIUM for non-birth scopes.

  4. Does the blocker decision matrix correctly reflect Phase-1 runtime truth? PASS. The matrix matches Phase-1: RISK-BYPASS PARTIAL, HOLD-1 LIVE pilot-exercised, HOLD-2 PARTIAL, Dieu 39 REGISTERED_NOT_EXECUTED, Dieu 35 NOT_PRODUCTION_READY.

  5. Are R1-R5 remediation packages correctly scoped and ordered? PASS. Default order R1 -> R2 -> R3 -> R4 -> R5 is defensible; R4 GUC confirmation and R1/R2 parallel scoping are noted as Owner-gated adjustments, not authorization.

  6. Does it keep technical design gated? PASS. Section 6 keeps full TD gated and only permits scoped read-only/diagnostic work after Owner opens a package.

  7. Is any blocker falsely marked resolved? PASS. The packet explicitly says every blocker remains OPEN and "No blocker is marked resolved."

  8. Is any package over-authorized? PASS. Each package contains forbidden actions and write-enabled approval requirements. No package authorizes writes, DOT execution, materialization, schema changes, GUC writes, or gate flips.

  9. Is a Claude patch needed before Owner chooses the first package? NO. The ~25,800 content_length in the execution report is a stale approximate metadata typo. It does not alter the decision matrix, caveat application, package gates, or Owner decisions.

Caveat Audit

C-1 PH1-F1 surface correction: PASS. Evidence in packet: PH1-F1 row says corrected surface is Dieu 39 / KG provenance, HIGH, universal_edges=2199, 0 provenance, "no provenance=quarantine." It explicitly rejects the old RISK-BYPASS classification.

C-2 PH1-F3 split: PASS. Evidence in packet: PH1-F3 is HIGH for birth-dependent/canonical-dependent TD and MEDIUM for non-birth scopes.

Documentary-Lag Audit

PASS. Section 3 separates documentary lag from runtime blockers:

  • RISK-BYPASS: old active bypass; runtime auto-approve neutered, residue remains.
  • Dieu 39 owner: old GOV-KG-SYS unregistered; runtime registered active but inert.
  • HOLD-1: old liveness unproven; runtime pilot lifecycle exercised, idle since 2026-05-27.
  • HOLD-2: old no atomic promote; runtime fn_iu_enact atomic for IU lineage, birth/stamp path blocked.

It does not treat documentary lag as blocker resolution.

Matrix Audit

PASS. Required rows are present:

  • Dieu 39 surface: HIGH, blocks Dieu 39 TD/implementation, R1.
  • PH1-F1: HIGH, R1.
  • HOLD-2 surface: PARTIAL/scoped, R2 + R5.
  • PH1-F3: HIGH birth-dependent / MEDIUM non-birth, R2.
  • Dieu 35 surface: HIGH/systemic, R3.
  • PH1-F4/F5: MEDIUM, R3.
  • RISK-BYPASS surface: PARTIAL, R4.
  • PH1-F2/F7: MEDIUM, R4.
  • HOLD-1: LIVE / MEDIUM, R5.
  • CONS-002/003 + CELL + GOV blockers: carried prerequisite gates, not resolved.

Package Audit

PASS.

R1 forbids edge writes, provenance materialization, KG DOT execution, kg schema change, and TBox mutation. R2 forbids birth writes, certify execution, BIRTH_STAMP/PROMOTE_STAMP materialization, Dieu 0-G schema change, and atomic-promote build. R3 forbids metadata writes, DOT/health execution, fn_dot_enforce_paired creation, dot_config writes, and system_issues auto-fix. R4 forbids residue auto-revert, GUC writes, warn-to-block flip before Dieu 35 criteria, and approval-path code change without separate authorization. R5 forbids IU/staging writes, gate flips, promote/cut execution, and pilot-warning flips.

Owner Decision Audit

PASS. OD-1..OD-8 are decision prompts, not actions:

  • OD-1 accept packet after review.
  • OD-2 documentary refresh.
  • OD-3 choose first package.
  • OD-4 decide 170-row residue disposition.
  • OD-5 confirm app.bypass_birth_gate and warn-to-block policy.
  • OD-6 authorize R2 read-only diagnostic.
  • OD-7 reconcile 1 undocumented admin fallback.
  • OD-8 keep CONS/CELL prerequisite gate.

No OD is treated as already authorized.

Non-Authorization Audit

PASS. Phase-1B does not authorize or perform live DB/runtime query, DDL/DML, remediation, implementation, TD, current corpus creation, draft adoption, blocker closure, DOT/KG/promote/birth/repair execution, schema changes, materialization, GUC writes, or authority-order/baseline changes.

Step Report

  • Step 0 foundation: read skill, OR, constitution/law anchors through Agent Data; applied no-background-agent rule.
  • Step 1 receive mission: control review only; no runtime query, no implementation.
  • Step 2 design before action: review method was source comparison: packet/report -> Phase-1 baseline -> law anchors -> checklist.
  • Step 3 code: N/A, no code changes. Only this local report file was created to satisfy AGENTS report requirement.
  • Step 4 two hats: Coder hat N/A; reviewer hat performed adversarial matrix/package/gate audit.
  • Step 5 verify: production/runtime verification N/A by mission prohibition. Real evidence pasted above from Agent Data/local read outputs.
  • Step 6 report: this file.

Final Decision

Owner may proceed to choose the first remediation macro package without requiring a Claude patch to Phase-1B. Recommended first package remains R1 by default, with R2 parallel scoping available if Owner explicitly authorizes it. No remediation, TD, implementation, or documentary refresh is authorized by this review.

Back to Knowledge Hub knowledge/current-state/reports/codex-review-phase1b-runtime-truth-blocker-decision-packet-2026-06-17.md